18 July 2012

Editorial: Indonesia’s South China Sea Dilemma - Between Neutrality And Self-Interest


By Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto

Indonesia perceives itself as a neutral party and potential mediator in the South China Sea disputes. But with self-interests and geopolitical realities that are now unfolding, this perception may soon become untenable.

Indonesia is not a claimant state in the South China Sea (SCS) with regard to the disputed ownership of islands located therein. But it has interests at stake, especially considering the overlap between China’s “9-dotted-line” claim and Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around the Natuna Islands, located at the southern part of SCS. However, Indonesians do not discuss this publicly lest it tarnish the image of a neutral party in the disputes.

Diplomatic Overtures

As a non-claimant state, Indonesia believes it is well-suited to play the role of mediator in the disputes. It began in 1990 when Jakarta initiated a series of informal workshops among interested parties of the SCS to encourage cooperation and enhance mutual confidence and understanding. More than 20 years on, however, this self-perception is increasingly untenable for several reasons.

Read the full story at Eurasia Review